Costa-Gavras: Politics as Cinema
Costa-Gavras has spent decades turning political reality into cinema that feels urgent and accessible. His films place power, injustice, and responsibility at the center, not as distant ideas, but as lived experiences. Rather than offering comfort, his work asks people to stay alert, to question systems, and to recognize how politics shapes everyday life.
Costa-Gavras emerged in the late 1960s, a period marked by global unrest and political tension. His breakthrough film, Z (1969), arrived at a moment when cinema was searching for new ways to respond to authoritarianism and state violence. Based on real events in Greece, the film exposed political assassination and cover-ups with a pace closer to a thriller than a traditional drama. This approach would become his signature. Politics, in his hands, was never static or academic. It was immediate, human, and deeply personal.
We can observe that Costa-Gavras refuses to separate politics from daily consequences. In The Confession (L’Aveu, 1970), inspired by Stalinist show trials, ideology becomes a mechanism that breaks bodies and minds. The film focuses on interrogation, repetition, and exhaustion. There is no spectacle, only pressure. Viewers are left to sit with the slow erosion of certainty and trust. Power operates quietly here, which makes it more unsettling.
His work in State of Siege (1972) shifted attention to Latin America, examining foreign intervention and political manipulation. Again, Costa-Gavras avoids easy heroes. Systems are shown as layered, often protected by language that claims order or stability. The film suggests that violence does not always arrive loudly. Sometimes it comes wrapped in policy and procedure.
One of his most widely discussed later films, Missing (1982), brings this perspective into a family story. Set during the Chilean coup, the film follows a father searching for his missing son. Bureaucracy becomes the antagonist. Offices replace prisons, and silence replaces force. The political becomes deeply emotional, not through speeches, but through absence and delay. The film earned Costa-Gavras international recognition without softening his stance. Palme d’Or was in his hand.
Style plays a crucial role in how these ideas land. Costa-Gavras favors handheld cameras, tight framing, and sharp editing. These choices create momentum and tension without relying on spectacle. The films move quickly, but they never feel rushed. This rhythm mirrors the confusion of living inside political crises, where decisions are made fast and explanations arrive late, if at all.
Compared to filmmakers like Gillo Pontecorvo or later political directors such as Oliver Stone, Costa-Gavras stays grounded in process. He is less interested in myth-making and more focused on mechanisms. Courts, prisons, newsrooms, and government offices recur across his films. These spaces reveal how authority operates through routine. By returning to them, he shows that injustice often survives because it looks ordinary.
It’s safe to say that Costa-Gavras is still relevant today because of his clarity. His films do not pretend neutrality, yet they avoid moral shortcuts. People are trusted to connect events, question motives, and recognize patterns. In an era of misinformation and rapid media cycles, this approach feels especially sharp. His cinema reminds us that political awareness is not passive. It requires attention and memory.
Costa-Gavras never treats politics as background noise. It is the frame, the pressure, and the consequence. Through decades of work, he has shown that cinema can confront power without losing its grip on storytelling.
Costa-Gavras uses film as a tool to examine how power moves through institutions and lives. His work stands as a reminder that politics is not distant. It is present, persistent, and deeply human.
Also read: Reflection on Agnès Varda
Pingback: Au Revoir les Enfants: Memory, Silence, and the Cost of Indifference - Jakarta Cinema Club